
Privacy Computing & Compliance Security
Hold the security and compliance line for regulated industries — federated + GNN cross-institution modeling, full domestic stack compatibility, end-to-end observability.
Key Capabilities
Four key capabilities required to put this technology into production.
Federated + GNN Modeling
Cross-institution training — raw data never leaves the domain.
Domestic Stack Compatibility
Ascend/Cambricon + Kylin/UOS full-stack — pass信创 audits in one shot.
Full-Chain Observability
Audit logs from ingest to inference — minute-level root cause.
One-Click Compliance Reports
GDPR / PIPL / CCPA / DSL reports auto-generated — 10× audit productivity.
Representative Scenarios
Inter-bank anti-fraud · multi-center medical research · gov/SOE信创 rollout · cross-border compliant analytics.
Download Solution Playbook
Generate a printable white paper for this module
Opens a playbook page with key capabilities, scenarios, outcomes, specs and case digest — use the browser's Save as PDF to distribute.
Case Studies
Filter anonymous scenario illustrations by industry, scenario and scale. Metrics and inferred customer, duration, stack and deployment metadata are unverified, not established customer outcomes.
Finance
2 casesIllustration · metrics unverified
Cross-bank AML federation
Banks model jointly without moving data — suspicious-path detection accuracy lifts.
- Customer
- Top-tier Banks / brokers / insurers
- Duration
- 6–8 weeks
- Tech stack
- Federated learning · Predictive modeling
- Deployment
- Private deployment
Illustration · metrics unverified
Hospital privacy-compute multi-center study
Tier-3 hospitals model clinical research jointly without moving data.
- Customer
- Top-tier Banks / brokers / insurers
- Duration
- 6–8 weeks
- Tech stack
- Federated learning · Predictive modeling
- Deployment
- Private deployment
Government
1 caseIllustration · metrics unverified
Domestic-stack government LLM
Ascend + Kylin full-domestic stack, certified at MLPS Level 3.
- Customer
- Top-tier Government & public sector
- Duration
- 6–8 weeks
- Tech stack
- Multimodal backbone
- Deployment
- Private deployment
Legal
1 caseIllustration · metrics unverified
SOE central-procurement compliance audit
End-to-end audit logs + homomorphic encryption; tender/contract handling is tamper-proof.
- Customer
- Top-tier Law firms & corporate legal/board offices
- Duration
- 6–8 weeks
- Tech stack
- Multimodal backbone
- Deployment
- Hybrid cloud
Specs & Fit
Federation protocol | Horizontal / vertical / transfer FL |
Privacy tech | MPC / DP / HE (optional) |
Chips | Ascend / Cambricon / NVIDIA |
OS | Kylin / UOS / Ubuntu |
Certifications | MLPS-3 / cryptographic eval / ISO 27001 |
FAQ
Does federation hurt accuracy?
<2% accuracy loss on mainstream tasks — far less than the compliance risk of moving data.
Which domestic chips are supported?
Ascend 910/910B, Cambricon MLU370/590 — production-validated.
Observability?
End-to-end audit logs for data flow, model calls and permission changes — tamper-proof.
Quantified Outcomes
We only ship technology that delivers ROI — here are the measurable metrics after enterprise rollout.
Zero raw-data egress, compliance audit from months to days, +8–15pp AUC on cross-institution joint models.
Defined scope. Accountable delivery.
Staged pricing & acceptance
Discovery, pilot and rollout have separate scope and fees. Contracts define baselines, evaluation samples, acceptance metrics and responsibility. Results are not unconditionally guaranteed.
Customer business data stays off-chain
Business records and personal data are not written to a blockchain. Confirm deployment region, model providers, access, retention and deletion in writing before work begins.
Clear contracting & delivery responsibility
Before signing, obtain and verify the legal entity, registration, jurisdiction, delivery owner and dispute terms. DAO collaboration does not replace contractual responsibility.
